The aim of this essay is going to focus on Realism in the High Victorian period and to explain why realist artists were especially known for their psychological character studies. First, the essay will start by introducing the Victorian
period. Secondly, it will analyse how Realism influenced English literature.
Finally, it will discuss the psychology of the characters from the perspectives
of George Eliot and Charles Dickens. In the case of Dickens, it will especially
focus on the psychology of the main characters using the book of Martin
Chuzzlewit (1844) and Bleak House (1853) and in the
case of Eliot, it will pay attention to women’s characterisation using the book
of Middlemarch (1871).
The Victorian period represents the reign of Queen Victoria of Great Britain
(1837-1901), some experts anticipate the beginning of the period, characterised
by important changes in cultural sensitivities and political concerns, to the
enactment of the Reform Act of 1832. It is a period where many changes are produced:
from rural villages with couch-and-four (a carriage pulled by four horses and
driven by one driver) that circulate on their roads, to large and modern cities
with complex railway systems intertwined with each other. This period is also
characterised by the overcrowded houses, where larger families live. In other
words, significant changes brought challenging problems and multiple
ambiguities difficult to solve. (Whitla, 2014).
From the cultural point of view, Victorianism extends from
late Romanticism to the Edwardian era of the twentieth century. Moreover, this period is not only found in England but also in Scotland, Wales and Ireland and
later in the century, it extends to India and other parts of the British
Empire. The term Victorian was applied to art as a set of styles and fashions
represented in the architecture, writing, and way of speaking proper of the
period. Although it was not recognized after years later, the year of the Great
Exhibition in 1851 (where the inventions of the Industrial Revolution were
taking place to show the progress of the growing human industry and its
unlimited imagination through machinery, manufactured products, and
sculptures), was the apex of the Victorian era. In this exhibition, British
people celebrated the success of the national institutions, the wealth of
commerce in the British Empire, the progress that steam power was having in
their industry, and the success of international trade (Whitla, 2014).
Once presented the Victorian period, I will analyse Realism
as a literary movement. Mullan states that realism is often thought to be a
tendency of Victorian fiction, and its first use in literature certainly was to
express ‘the loyal representation of the real world’. In an essay on the artist
and critic John Ruskin (1819-1900) George Eliot claimed that realism was the
doctrine where truth and beauty can be found by doing a humble analysis of
nature. Moreover, she believed that it couldn’t be substituted by the
imagination of uncertain feelings, that is to say, Naturalism, the other
literary movement of this period. Eliot specially insisted on the modesty that
this realism must have, she wanted to focus her attention on the ‘ordinary’. In
her first novel Adam Bede (1859),
she wanted to prove the truthfulness she was aiming, to the quality. To do
this, she describes many Dutch paintings that ‘high-minded people’ ignored. She
found sympathy in those faithful paintings of a monotonous home activity and
she tried to transmit this feeling in her novel.
By using this type of comparisons and descriptions faithful
to reality, she gave a special value to the accurate presentation of
appearances. However, she thought that characterisation was more than a simple
description, it was the key to realism. In 1856, she criticized Charles Dickens
in a famous article for being considered the most representative of this style
of society’s descriptions. But unable to pass from the humorous and superficial
to the emotional and tragic without being as transcendent as he was before in
his artistic truthfulness, George Eliot said that Dickens did a ‘frequently
false psychology’, and it was more evident when he described lower class
people, such as poor children, artisans or melodramatic boatmen. For her,
Dickens was not a realist. Henry James, a later American author between
literary realism and literary modernism, will later describe him as ‘the
greatest of superficial novelists’ (Mullan, 2014).
Moreover, Dicken’s truth to reality troubled seriously the
critics of his day as it has troubled readers since he wrote his novels.
Dickens himself sometimes asserted the reality of his fiction, as for instance,
in the third edition of Oliver Twist (1841),
where he had to respond to critics saying that he presented criminals and
prostitutes as the faithful reality. In this book, in particular, criminals are
badly treated and represented, but nevertheless, prostitutes, like Nancy, have
a sympathetic representation. Another good example of this appears in Bleak House (1852-3)
when Dickens turned to the body of Jo, a crossing poor sweeper, to address
wealthy people of his own society.
Dead, your Majesty. Dead, my lords and gentlemen. Dead,
right reverends, and wrong reverends of every order. Dead, men and women, born
with heavenly compassion in your hearts. And dying thus around us every day
(Dickens, 1853, p. 892).
Mr. Pecksniff was a moral man... Perhaps there never was a
more moral man than Mr. Pecksniff.... [H]e had a Fortunatus's purse of good
sentiments on his inside... [He] was like the girl in the fairy tale, except
that if they were not actual diamonds that fell from his lips, they were the
very brightest paste... He was a most exemplary man: fuller of virtuous precept
than a copy-book. Some people likened him to a direction-post, which is always
telling the way to a place, and never goes there... His very throat was moral.
You saw a good deal of it. You looked over a very low fence of white cravat
(whereof no man had ever beheld the tie, for he fastened it behind), and there
it lay... serene and whiskerless before you (Dickens, 1867, p. 354).
In this quote, it can be seen that Dickens uses several
literary devices to describe him and make the reader think in a particular
perspective about the architect. One of them is the third-person narrator in
order to use sarcasm, that is to say, Dickens uses the verbal irony that contrasts
with what is meant to be. To ridicule Pecksniff 's
hypocrisy: what it may sound like a compliment, such as ‘moral man’, ‘sleek’ or
‘oily’ actually implies that he is a phony person, a trait that presages his
motivations in later actions (Renzi, 2010).
Besides irony, Dickens uses literary devices to describe
his characters through implied comparisons to other authors’ characters. As for
instance, when he describes Pecksniff as ‘fuller of virtuous precept than a
copy-book’ in the quote, faintly alluding to Polonius in the book of Hamlet, who spoke
with epithets without coherence. Furthermore, Dickens also makes a public
display of what morality had to be while at the same time he is hiding his dark
side from the others. The narrator finishes by embodying Pecksniff’s hypocrisy
physically, in his way of dressing and in his appearance. After establishing
this character’s basic personality, Dickens uses these central traits to
recreate new situations in order to expose the psychological portrait of the
character (Renzi, 2010). It is for these reasons that the complexity of the
main characters’ descriptions had such importance in his works. For instance,
he does not simply say that Pecksiff is a completely hypocritical snob, he
tries to show the reader (thanks to his actions) how the character really is,
showing at the same time one of his best skills.
Another type of characterisation that realists carried out
was women’s characterisation. K. Hughes considers Eliot as one of the best
representatives of this type of characterisation. Eliot’s attitude towards
women’s rights, education and place in society, and how this attitude is
expressed in the psychological portrays of the characters, were her most
valuable features. One of these examples can be found in one of her books, Middlemarch. At
the end of the story, the author tells us what will later happen to the heroine
of the story, Dorothea Brooke. As a young woman at the beginning of the story,
Dorothea compares herself to Spanish Saint Teresa of Avila, a 16th-century
mystic and social reformer who wanted to make a better world. However, Dorothea
was born three centuries later, in a highly materialistic century in which
there was no coherent social faith or order that could teach her soul how to
improve the world.
By consequence, Dorothea ends her life married and with the
despair that nobody will remember her. Despite this fact, Eliot makes us see
that she was such a wonderful person that readers do not have to feel
disappointed at her for being condemned to a monotonous life. It is obvious
that the heroine didn’t achieve the greatness and importance she wanted to
have, but the day-to-day acts she performed, such as her kindness to people,
had a profound effect within her domestic style of life. Therefore, the role
she played as wife, mother, and friend, was, in some circumstances, her best
and most valuable feature (Hughes, 2014).
But the effect of her being on those around her
was incalculably diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly
dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as
they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden
life, and rest in unvisited tombs” (Eliot, 1997, p.785).
In sum, this essay
discussed the different types of characters that realist writers realised in
their works and showed the importance of psychological character studies. It
also analysed two types of descriptions, in the case of Dickens, it has been
the main characters’ descriptions and in the case of Eliot has been a women’s
description. Last, but not least, this essay has exposed the differences
between both writers, especially in the critic done by Eliot, where she accused
Dickens of doing frequently false psychology.
References
Dickens, Charles, 2000. Bleak House.
London: ElecBook.
Dickens, C. (1867). The life and
adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit. Charles Dickens ed. Boston: Ticknor
and Fields.
Eliot, George, & Carroll, D. 1997, Middlemarch,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost,
viewed 18 March 2018.
Hughes, Kathryn, 2014. The British Library.
Available at: https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/george-eliots-women
[Last access: 16 May 2018].
Available at: https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/george-eliots-women
[Last access: 16 May 2018].
Mullan, John, 2014. Discovering Literature: Romantics and
Victorians. [Enlínea]
Available at: https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/realism
Available at: https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/realism
[Last access: 15 March 2018].
Pierce, G. A., 2013. The Dickens Dictionary. Massachusets:
Courier Corporation.
Renzi, T. C. (2010, January). What a 'character': Dickens
was a master at creating memorable individuals and bringing them to life. Why
not put some of his techniques to work in your own fiction? The Writer, 123(1),
26. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A213601179/LitRC?u=ed_itw&sid=LitRC&xid=a937d209
Shea, V, &Whitla, W (eds) 2014, Victorian Literature:
An Anthology, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, Hoboken. Available from:
ProQuest Ebook Central. [16 March 2018].